ATI Radeon HD 4670

Introduced in the middle of September 2008, the Radeon HD 4670 is a mainstream graphics card from ATI. Based on the latest 4000 series R700 GPU, the 4670 is based on the same 55nm fabrication process, comes with 512MB or 1GB of memory and has a 128bit memory bus. While considerably handicapped by the poor bus width, performance in the latest games remains quite high on lower resolutions. Aimed at competing with Nvidia's mainstream 9500GT offering, the 4670 outperforms it by quite a large margin, almost matching the 9600 GSO and GT in a variety of games and benchmarks, and matching the previous generation performance model from AMD, the 3850 - all while using considerably less energy and producing far less heat. Rated at a maximum 75W TDP, the 4670 does not require any additional power connections. Sadly, while the card has captured the attention of many for introducing great performance for a relatively low price, its launch has been rather lackluster, only seeing 2-3 companies release cards within the first couple weeks of launch.

Where to Buy

ATI Radeon HD 4670
MSRP $79.00
Release date September, 2008
Brand AMD, ATI
love it
want it
have it
tag it
Pros & Cons9
Reviews6
Details
Buy It
Competitors3
Comments3
twitter

Pros & Cons

ProSCORE
5 reviews
48
negative
mixed
positive
2 positive
1 mixed
2 negative

[i] How is the ProSCORE calculated?

show me!

Pros:
Do you agree?
as fast as the previous generation performance card
+5agreedisagree

low heat and power consumption
+3agreedisagree

good for HTPC (not full length, single slot, can be cooled passively)
+3agreedisagree

faster but cheaper compared to the 9500GT
+3agreedisagree

Cons:
Do you agree?
poor driver availability within the first 2 months of launch
+2agreedisagree

no passive options - almost all fan-based options have small noisy fans
+2agreedisagree

a little expensive compared to the 9600GT
+1agreedisagree

poor availability
+1agreedisagree

took too long to be launched
+1agreedisagree


5 people added to this review by submitting or voting on pros and cons. Add your say!

Details

Features

  • GPU: RV730 XT, 750MHz
  • Texture Units: 32
  • ROPs: 8
  • Transistors: 514M
  • VRAM: 512MB GDDR3 @ 2000MHz or 1GB DDR3 @ 1800MHz, 128bit interface
  • TDP: <75W

Submit a link

This report was started September 19, 2008 at 11:27 am by Yale
with the last edit occurring September 25, 2009 at 1:02 pm by Lefty10
This page has been viewed 6982 times, with 79 edits by 9 contributors.
See the full report history »

Buy It

Sapphire HD 4670 512MB GDDR3 PCI-E

• Sapphire Radeon HD4670 512MB DDR3 Dual DVI / TVO PCI-Express Graphics Card

• Sapphire Radeon HD 4670 - 512MB DDR3, PCI Express 2.0, CrossFireX Ready, Dual DVI, HDTV, HDMI Support, Video Card

UPC: 840777035504

EAN: 840777035504

MPN: 100255L

Sapphire HD 4670 512MB GDDR3 PCI-E

Asus EAH4670/DI/512M

• ASUS Radeon HD 4670 EAH4670/DI/512M/A Video Card

MPN: EAH4670DI512MA

Asus EAH4670/DI/512M

• Radeon HD 4670 Video Card

UPC: 610839040025

MPN: 90C1CLP0J0UAN00Z

Competitors

ATI Radeon HD 4670 is ranked 1st among it's competitors.  See the top picks in Video Cards »

Suggest a new competitor to add to the list of competing products.
If the product hasn't yet been added to ProductWiki, submitting it here will also start the product report.

Comments

1.  avatar be2ny said:

In jan 08 i use 7900GS, and today i'am using HD 4670.

this is awsome Vcard!, i love pc game, and this is my other lover after my wive
Sep 22, 2008 10:16pm
2.  avatar Yale said:

Up until yesterday there were no official drivers for this card. IMO that's complete shit. Something was clearly wrong with the ASUS version I picked up and I returned it after bricking it with an official BIOS update. Don't think I want a video card with active cooling either way... Still highly recommended though if you can believe that :)
Oct 17, 2008 6:30pm
3.  avatar Yale said:

Well - I went out and bought the Sapphire version of the card. The drivers work nicely, and the fan slows to 3% at idle (47C) so very nice! However, it is still clearly audible in my system. I also bought the Accelero S1, but I don't know if I should mount a fan on it, or if it can even be mounted on the 4670 at all.

Edit: I did end up mounting the S1. Very pleased. Completely silent, idles at 40C and only gets up to 55C in a hot room.

Nov 07, 2008 2:34pm
Some HTML is allowed. Your comments remain editable after you post..

Reviews

Sort by: Most helpful  •  Newest  •  Most positive

Yale

avatar
March 31, 2009
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
44
negative
mixed
positive
4 pros
5 cons
love itlove it
have ithave it
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

Pros

  • as fast as the previous generation performance card
  • low heat and power consumption
  • good for HTPC (not full length, single slot, can be cooled passively)
  • faster but cheaper compared to the 9500GT

Cons

  • poor driver availability within the first 2 months of launch
  • no passive options - almost all fan-based options have small noisy fans
  • a little expensive compared to the 9600GT
  • poor availability
  • took too long to be launched

Comments

"Up until yesterday there were no official drivers for this card. IMO that's complete shit. Something was clearly wrong with the ASUS version I picked up and I returned it after bricking it with an official BIOS update. Don't think I want a video card with active cooling either way... Still highly recommended though if you can believe that :)"
"

Well - I went out and bought the Sapphire version of the card. The drivers work nicely, and the fan slows to 3% at idle (47C) so very nice! However, it is still clearly audible in my system. I also bought the Accelero S1, but I don't know if I should mount a fan on it, or if it can even be mounted on the 4670 at all.

Edit: I did end up mounting the S1. Very pleased. Completely silent, idles at 40C and only gets up to 55C in a hot room.

"

Competitors

Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

Omar

avatar
September 22, 2008
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
75
negative
mixed
positive
3 pros
1 con
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

Pros

  • as fast as the previous generation performance card
  • low heat and power consumption
  • good for HTPC (not full length, single slot, can be cooled passively)

Cons

  • poor availability

Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

meNNis

avatar
December 16, 2008
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
100
negative
mixed
positive
1 pro
0 cons
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

Pros

  • as fast as the previous generation performance card

Cons

Did not agree with any cons

Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

http://www.productwiki.com/sarasein

avatar
April 1, 2009
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
33
negative
mixed
positive
2 pros
4 cons
love itlove it

Pros

  • as fast as the previous generation performance card
  • faster but cheaper compared to the 9500GT

Cons

  • poor driver availability within the first 2 months of launch
  • no passive options - almost all fan-based options have small noisy fans
  • a little expensive compared to the 9600GT
  • took too long to be launched

Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

rasokevin

avatar
November 10, 2008
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
0
negative
mixed
positive
0 pros
1 con
0 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

Pros

Did not agree with any pros

Cons

  • poor availability

Competitors

rasokevin prefers ATI Radeon HD 4670 over Nvidia GeForce 9500GT
Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

Twitter

- join or start the conversation

... Loading for latest tweets from search.twitter.com..

tweetie

Price comparison information by: