en-us http://www.productwiki.com/duxsyagius/ Activity feed http://www.productwiki.com/duxsyagius/#item-24815 <div><p><em>November 25, 2007 at 10:37 pm</em></p> <img src="http://www.productwiki.com/upload/images/microsoft_zune_80_1-75-75.jpg" border="0"/> <p>"I think reviewers should keep things in perspective. Both players are essentially the same. I think the Ipod has more doo dads and accessories though. You can argue the point that the Zune has a radio, but other will say reception is not always good so whats the point. Some will say that the Ipod is more useful because you can use it as a HDD. Others will say that is not what an MP3 player is for though. You say tomayto and I say, well, tomahto. The real difference is battery life though. No one can argue the point on that though. I ran a continous loop of the family guy for 12.5 HOURS STRAIGHT on the 160GB classic. No joke. Seriously. I might have gotten 13 had I not been tired of waiting. I had screen brightness an 10% and the volume at 40%. I have never supported apple and I dont think I will ever buy anything from them again. But I couldnt pass up the battery life. I had bought a Zen vision:M just 3 months ago because it could play video for 6 hours (which is 2 hours more than the 5.5 gen Ipod). It was a waste but I sold it. I can honestly say the Ipod is better because you never really have to worry about the battery giving out on you. 3.2" screen is great but if you only get to use it for 3 or 4 hours its kind of a rip. I never want to have to choose between music of video because my battery may give out on me."</p></div> Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:37:55 -0500 DuxSyagius http://www.productwiki.com/duxsyagius/#item-24815 http://www.productwiki.com/duxsyagius/#item-164722 <div><p><em>November 25, 2007 at 10:21 pm</em></p></div> Sun, 25 Nov 2007 22:21:11 -0500 DuxSyagius http://www.productwiki.com/duxsyagius/#item-164722