<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Frash - ProductWiki</title>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <link>http://www.productwiki.com/frash/</link>
    <description>Activity feed</description>
    <item>
      <title>Frash joined the site </title>
      <link>http://www.productwiki.com/frash/#item-159847</link>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;August 30, 2006 at 2:26 pm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:26:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Frash</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.productwiki.com/frash/#item-159847</guid>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Frash commented on Why the Wii Won't Sell </title>
      <link>http://www.productwiki.com/frash/#item-22467</link>
      <description>&lt;div&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;August 30, 2006 at 2:26 pm&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt; &lt;img src="http://images.productwiki.com/upload/images/nintendo_wii1-75-75.jpg" border="0"/&gt; &lt;p&gt;"Heh. I disagree with your speech (well, kind of, since it's written :D). There would be many things to say, but I'll say the one that touches me the most: regarding the first paragraph, "The last E3", I'd say that future can be different than the past. If a kid aged 4 steps on a piece of dog crap, his mom yells at him and the next time he'll be careful to not do the same mistake (at least, if he's not SO retarded). IMHO, Nintendo has the situation under control this time. Third party developers are REALLY going to develope on Wii. And their games are going to sell just because they'll not be the "average third party shit" we can usually see on consoles. They'll be unique games such as Red Steel, Sadness and probably many other exclusives. Plus, I feel like Wii will give third parties a way to make their voice listened by people. Or maybe, they feel more important. I don't know, but I'm a person who usually buys just first and second parties games because I don't have a job yet - that means not enough money to waste on something I -may- not like. I must be sure I'll like something before I buy it (except for food). Third party games often doesn't reach my interest standards. THey seem too "cheap", in terms of innovation, to me, unlike the average first party game (from Nintendo, I'd say). Now, with the latest Nintendo news I noticed I AM really intersted in third party games on Wii. Even Rayman Raving Rabbids interests me more than any other Rayman game ever did. Is this just me changing? I don't think so. And analysts may be wrong. Especially if the society they talk about quits producing interesting games for periods of many months, leaving the market to averagely boring third party games (as we've seen on GameCube). IMHO, WIi has still got all the right factors to sell to a big mass of people. Ok, if this mass of people won't be as big as Sony's or Microsoft's, it doesn't count. It'll still sell something. And Nintendo will avoid the bankrupt for at least a good 5-10 years as it did with all the previous consoles :D (and will always do, I hope). (Oh, excuse me for all the mistakes I may've done in these few lines of text, but I'm Italian.)"&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Aug 2006 14:26:29 -0400</pubDate>
      <author>Frash</author>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.productwiki.com/frash/#item-22467</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
