gatesjeff33

Sort by: Most helpful  •  Newest  •  Most positive
ProSCORE
100
negative
mixed
positive
4 pros
0 cons
[i]1 out of 1 people found this review helpful
Review date: March 31, 2009
*
March 31, 2009 at 3:06 pm
Agreed: "affordable price"
Disagreed: "affordable price"
Agreed: "affordable price"
*
March 30, 2009 at 3:03 pm
Found yale's review unhelpful
New pro/con: This processor is based off the k10 phenoms. It is actual a x4 with two cores turned off. You can there for OVERCLOCK this proc. faster than a quad core.
Agreed: "fast speed"
Agreed: "affordable price"
Agreed: "dual core is all you generally need these days - very few applications are written to take full advantage of any more"
- gatesjeff33 sent a message to yale
March 30, 2009 at 3:00 pm
"Your review of the AMD 7750 is wrong. The TDP is 95 watts for the x4, x3, and x2.... HMMMMMM lets think about this for a second... They all have the same architecture, but different number of cores. Gee, maybe when you get the dual core you will realize that it doesn't come close to 95 more
- gatesjeff33 joined the site
March 30, 2009 at 2:56 pm
1.  avatar Yale
Yeah you're right... I was unfair and completely contradictory even. I was probably just frustrated with Phenom I that day I guess :p I'll correct myself. I don't think I'd be happy with a 90W triple core or quad let alone a dual core... Waiting for AMD to match Intel's recent release of 65W quads before jumping on board.

Anyway, welcome on board. Stick around and feel free to yell at me some more ;)

Yale

Post a message to this person:
Some HTML is allowed. Your message remains editable after you send..
Send privately: only this person will be able to see the message.
avatar

My Profile

Joined on Mar 30, 2009
ProRANK 1124
Reviews Written 1
Helpful Reviews 0
Helpful Ratio 0
Profile Views 36
Comments 1
Reports Started 0
Products Tapped 0