Pluto Probe: An Advancment in Science, Or A Big Waste of Money


fileunderFound in Home
Sort by: Oldest  •  Newest  •  User
member
view 
avatar
As we all know, Nasa launched a Pluto Probe in 2006 that will reach Pluto in 2015. However, later in 2006, Pluto was demoted to a dwarf planet. The question here is is the probe an advancement in science for its purpose to photograph Pluto, is it a waste of money, or could we have put the money used for the probe for a better use. I for one think that even though these will be our first photos of Pluto, that we could have used the money for better purposes, since Pluto's size is insignificant compared to the other planets, not counting the two other dwarf planets, Eris and Ceres. The second pirates of the caribbean move cost more than the probe was, but the movie makers used private money whereas NASA uses our tax money to build its space vehicles. According to my sources, when the probe eventually reaches Pluto and takes pictures, the pictures will take 5 hours to reach earth at the speed of light. As i said, is this probe an advancement in science, or could we have put the money to better use. Please post your opinions on this, as i am eager to hear them.
moderator
view 
avatar
First off, it's too late to do anything about it now. The probe is on its way, and the money has already been spent. I'm almost cetain NASA wouldn't have gone through with the project had Pluto been demoted before the launch. Still, the probe could yeild valuable information about the workings and formations of dwarf planets. Then again, we may just get some very detailed pictures of a gray rock. Or some aliens. The money that created the probe could have had numerous other great uses. Too late now. We'll just have to wait for those pictures of Pluto to come back to Earth. Then we shall see whats the deal with Pluto.
admin
view 
avatar

It's most definitely NOT a waste of money, and Pluto's classification of a planet or dwarf planet makes no difference. I'm pretty passionate about this stuff, so I warn you that it might get a bit boring, but you started the conversation so too bad!

A designation of planet or not has no bearing on how significant Pluto is to our knowledge. Just because researchers changed the label, it doesn't change the fact that Pluto is constructed from a mass of ice and rock (99% ice). Studying Pluto will give humans information about the beginning of the Solar System and how it started, as well as information about the deeper secrets of the Universe itself. You'd be amazed by how much information you can determine from some pictures of the surface. Because our information of the solar system already includes quite a bit of information, examining pictures of the surface lets us process them and look for clues that will confirm various theories and open up new questions we didn't even know existed.

That's not even including all the benefits of creating the probe in the first place. Going to Pluto is a difficult thing, therefore technology must be created to sustain the Probe's life as it travels through space on its way to the little guy. The technological advancements discovered through the creation of the probe will spread around the consumer industry in due time, and this is a large part of how the general public benefits from NASA programs. How do you think we got things like diapers and Microwaves? Yup, NASA!

moderator
view 
avatar

You've convinced me omar.

Post Reply:

File Under: