saleBlack Friday see store specials

Kaspersky Anti-Virus

KAV is the core product of Kaspersky Labs and can be found in their other added protection products. Featuring hourly updates of; Virus, Spyware, Malware, and Script blocking as well as the most flexible scanning features of any product on the market. Alert settings are available from Novice to Expert (and that means real expert mode) for all types of threat detections. KAV has a 98.86 detection rate with a 86% disinfection rating.

Where to Buy

Kaspersky Anti-Virus 2010 (9.0)
MSRP $59.99
Release date July, 2009
love it
want it
have it
tag it
Pros & Cons13
Reviews8
Details
Buy It
Competitors3
Comments3
twitter

Pros & Cons

ProSCORE
8 reviews
74
negative
mixed
positive
6 positive
0 mixed
2 negative

[i] How is the ProSCORE calculated?

show me!

Pros:
Do you agree?
•
Rootkit & Deep Heuristic (flexible settings)
+5agreedisagree

•
Flexible "Trusted Zone" settings (by action)
+5agreedisagree

•
Hourly Updates
+4agreedisagree

•
Less than 2 hour virus response time
+4agreedisagree

•
Realtime port monitoring (all or selected)
+4agreedisagree

•
Low system resource requirements
+4agreedisagree

•
98.86 Detection Rate
+3agreedisagree

Cons:
Do you agree?
•
Very Advanced and Complicated (in advanced mode)
+2agreedisagree

•
Takes up too much CPU/RAM when running in background
+2agreedisagree

•
Sometimes fails to detect new viruses (comparison via VirusTotal.org)
+2agreedisagree

•
Not able to run on "on demand only" (no realtime scan or background tasks) mode
+1agreedisagree

•
Sometimes annoying
+1agreedisagree

•
No native 64-bit version
+1agreedisagree


8 people added to this review by submitting or voting on pros and cons. Add your say!
See individual votes »

Details

There aren't any external resources listed here yet.

Submit a link

This report was started January 12, 2008 at 9:33 am by Charon9
with the last edit occurring Friday, 6:30 AM by Fugazi
This page has been viewed 1271 times, with 71 edits by 11 contributors.
See the full report history »

Buy It

Kaspersky Anti-Virus

• Kaspersky Anti-Virus 7.0 [OLD VERSION]

• Anti-Virus 7.0 (Full Product)

UPC: 689076056175

EAN: 689076056175

MPN: KAV70BOXNC

Competitors

Kaspersky Anti-Virus is ranked 3rd among it's competitors.  See the top picks in Antivirus, Firewall, & Spyware »
Microsoft Security Essentials

Microsoft Security Essentials

MSRP  $0.00    Released  September, 2009
Pros
  • Low on resources
  • Not annoying
  • makes it easy to run Windows without worrying about crappy virus scanners
  • updated often
  • Free for Windows users (commercial too!)
Cons
  • Could use translation to more languages
ProSCORE
3 reviews
93
Vote! (1 vote)
vote Kaspersky Anti-Virus 0% vs. vote Microsoft Security Essentials 100%
BitDefender AntiVirus 2008

BitDefender AntiVirus 2008

MSRP  $24.99    Released  January, 2008
Pros
  • Takes up much less resources than most
  • Windows Vista 32/64 bit support
  • Small installation size
  • Free edition available
  • Gamer mode
ProSCORE
2 reviews
100
Vote! (2 votes)
vote Kaspersky Anti-Virus 50% vs. vote BitDefender AntiVirus 2008 50%
Norton Internet Security

Norton Internet Security

MSRP  --    Released  --
Cons
  • VERY high CPU usage while scanning
  • Takes inordinate amount of time to run updates
  • Scanning engine is poor
ProSCORE
1 review
0
Vote! (0 votes)
vote Kaspersky Anti-Virus   vs. vote Norton Internet Security  

Suggest a new competitor to add to the list of competing products.
If the product hasn't yet been added to ProductWiki, submitting it here will also start the product report.

Comments

1.  avatar Charon9 said:

I purchased KAV after trying to deal with corrupted live updates from Norton, and having to manually install updates. It was on sale for 20 bucks (it goes on sale every couple of months for that price) and had one of the highest ratings I could find.

These ratings are true to life. When I installed KAV it detected 3 viruses that Norton had missed, the oldest of which was over 6 months old and that alone was very impressive. Next on the list of pro's would be is memory and CPU footprint, on my machine the whole of the KAV product has less of a footprint than one of Norton's loads (much less all of them) and 1/4 of AVG's.
SPECS: 2 TSR loads @ 13K (6308 & 6772) Slice time: 42s of 161H (one tsr) 1H25m of 161H (including full system scan x 7 days (system up time 161H/24=days) & 1 Startup scan) - Normally less than 5M slice on startup scan.
Time Slice== 1.13 @ 7 full scans (once per day) Time slice is figured on the number of seconds used by uptime of system.

Alert modes range from simple to advanced: Advanced alert mode is NOT SUGGESTED for the average user, this thing tells you every single change in the system and will drive you nuts. Basically it can range between "Virus detected" and "program hook intrusion" (which is moving your mouse over something)

Scanning options are indescribable in flexibility. You could have your machine do a full and thorough scan every hour (not suggested as it is a long operation). I have mine setup to do a full scan 1 time per week, a full scan on new files every day, and a single critical system scan on startup; after downloading the latest updates. Of course you could change this to any number of possibilities.

TSR and other plug-in scanners are totally flexible in operation - monitoring; Script, Web, Downloads (on the fly), ActiveX, Mail (web and SMTP); just to name a few.

Tech Support as well as User Support Forums are all top notch, there are no flames and every question is answered with respect (no matter how trivial or complex).

Jan 12, 2008 9:56am
2.  avatar mojo said:

I used KAV since version 4. Generally, it functions quite well, detecting more viruses than average (e.g. AntiVir) and slowing the system down less than Norton or McAfee. However, there is definitely noticeable slowdown and the latest version cannot be run in an "on demand" scan only mode.

Beware of bogus claims about 99% detection rates. These tests are performed by av-comparatives.org, but do not give a very clear or realistic picture. For example, AntiVir is rated very highly, but in practice rarely picks up the latest viruses. Kaspersky is similar - despite the hourly updates it often misses new viruses even with heuristic scanning turned on. Unfortunately no AV program detects everything, which is why it is important to run more than one. Unfortunately, Kaspersky cannot be run along side another AV program.
Jan 18, 2008 7:34pm
3.  avatar dialupinternetuser said:

I know some people with this and all it seems to do is hog ram, have a firewall that even when configured correctly blocks whatever program your trying to use, and doesn't detect viruses. I'll stick with AVG Free.
Jan 19, 2008 10:38am
Some HTML is allowed. Your comments remain editable after you post..

Reviews

Sort by: Most helpful  •  Newest  •  Most positive

Charon9

avatar
January 12, 2008
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
88
negative
mixed
positive
7 pros
1 con
have ithave it
1 out of 1 people found this review helpful.

Pros

  • Rootkit & Deep Heuristic (flexible settings)
  • Flexible "Trusted Zone" settings (by action)
  • Hourly Updates
  • Less than 2 hour virus response time
  • Realtime port monitoring (all or selected)
  • Low system resource requirements
  • 98.86 Detection Rate

Cons

  • Very Advanced and Complicated (in advanced mode)

Comments

"

I purchased KAV after trying to deal with corrupted live updates from Norton, and having to manually install updates. It was on sale for 20 bucks (it goes on sale every couple of months for that price) and had one of the highest ratings I could find.

These ratings are true to life. When I installed KAV it detected 3 viruses that Norton had missed, the oldest of which was over 6 months old and that alone was very impressive. Next on the list of pro's would be is memory and CPU footprint, on my machine the whole of the KAV product has less of a footprint than one of Norton's loads (much less all of them) and 1/4 of AVG's.
SPECS: 2 TSR loads @ 13K (6308 & 6772) Slice time: 42s of 161H (one tsr) 1H25m of 161H (including full system scan x 7 days (system up time 161H/24=days) & 1 Startup scan) - Normally less than 5M slice on startup scan.
Time Slice== 1.13 @ 7 full scans (once per day) Time slice is figured on the number of seconds used by uptime of system.

Alert modes range from simple to advanced: Advanced alert mode is NOT SUGGESTED for the average user, this thing tells you every single change in the system and will drive you nuts. Basically it can range between "Virus detected" and "program hook intrusion" (which is moving your mouse over something)

Scanning options are indescribable in flexibility. You could have your machine do a full and thorough scan every hour (not suggested as it is a long operation). I have mine setup to do a full scan 1 time per week, a full scan on new files every day, and a single critical system scan on startup; after downloading the latest updates. Of course you could change this to any number of possibilities.

TSR and other plug-in scanners are totally flexible in operation - monitoring; Script, Web, Downloads (on the fly), ActiveX, Mail (web and SMTP); just to name a few.

Tech Support as well as User Support Forums are all top notch, there are no flames and every question is answered with respect (no matter how trivial or complex).

"
Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

MrFats

avatar
January 17, 2008
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
78
negative
mixed
positive
7 pros
2 cons

Pros

  • Rootkit & Deep Heuristic (flexible settings)
  • Flexible "Trusted Zone" settings (by action)
  • Hourly Updates
  • Less than 2 hour virus response time
  • Realtime port monitoring (all or selected)
  • Low system resource requirements
  • 98.86 Detection Rate

Cons

  • Very Advanced and Complicated (in advanced mode)
  • Takes up too much CPU/RAM when running in background

Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

lintingjui

avatar
January 13, 2008
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
78
negative
mixed
positive
7 pros
2 cons

Pros

  • Rootkit & Deep Heuristic (flexible settings)
  • Flexible "Trusted Zone" settings (by action)
  • Hourly Updates
  • Less than 2 hour virus response time
  • Realtime port monitoring (all or selected)
  • Low system resource requirements
  • 98.86 Detection Rate

Cons

  • Very Advanced and Complicated (in advanced mode)
  • Takes up too much CPU/RAM when running in background

Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

douchrti

avatar
March 19, 2008
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
100
negative
mixed
positive
7 pros
0 cons
love itlove it

Pros

  • Rootkit & Deep Heuristic (flexible settings)
  • Flexible "Trusted Zone" settings (by action)
  • Hourly Updates
  • Less than 2 hour virus response time
  • Realtime port monitoring (all or selected)
  • Low system resource requirements
  • 98.86 Detection Rate

Cons

Did not agree with any cons

Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

Fugazi

avatar
Friday, 6:25 AM
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
60
negative
mixed
positive
3 pros
2 cons
have ithave it

Pros

  • Rootkit & Deep Heuristic (flexible settings)
  • Flexible "Trusted Zone" settings (by action)
  • Less than 2 hour virus response time

Cons

  • Sometimes annoying
  • No native 64-bit version

Competitors

Fugazi prefers Microsoft Security Essentials over Kaspersky Anti-Virus
Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

mojo

avatar
August 9, 2008
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
0
negative
mixed
positive
0 pros
3 cons
have ithave it

Pros

Did not agree with any pros

Cons

  • Takes up too much CPU/RAM when running in background
  • Sometimes fails to detect new viruses (comparison via VirusTotal.org)
  • Not able to run on "on demand only" (no realtime scan or background tasks) mode

Comments

"I used KAV since version 4. Generally, it functions quite well, detecting more viruses than average (e.g. AntiVir) and slowing the system down less than Norton or McAfee. However, there is definitely noticeable slowdown and the latest version cannot be run in an "on demand" scan only mode.

Beware of bogus claims about 99% detection rates. These tests are performed by av-comparatives.org, but do not give a very clear or realistic picture. For example, AntiVir is rated very highly, but in practice rarely picks up the latest viruses. Kaspersky is similar - despite the hourly updates it often misses new viruses even with heuristic scanning turned on. Unfortunately no AV program detects everything, which is why it is important to run more than one. Unfortunately, Kaspersky cannot be run along side another AV program."
Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

kslkguard

avatar
October 22, 2009
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
100
negative
mixed
positive
1 pro
0 cons

Pros

  • Low system resource requirements

Cons

Did not agree with any cons

Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

kayleech

avatar
April 3, 2008
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
0
negative
mixed
positive
0 pros
1 con
have ithave it

Pros

Did not agree with any pros

Cons

  • Sometimes fails to detect new viruses (comparison via VirusTotal.org)

Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

Twitter

tweet this product!
- join or start the conversation
Search twitter: search

... Loading for latest tweets from search.twitter.com..

tweetie

sponsored by:
Price comparison information by:

This product is also known as:

Anti, Virus, AntiVirus