The LG BH200 is the second generation LG Super Blu HD DVD/Blu-ray combo player coming out in mid-October for $999 (see the previous generation LG BH100). The major selling point of this player is its ability to play both of the new competing High Def DVD formats. Since not all movies are release in both formats, this player can play up to 60% more titles than standalone players. This ability comes at a steep price tag, with the BH200 retailing for $600 more than the Toshiba HD-A30 which boasts similar specs, but only plays HD DVDs.

Where to Buy

LG BH200
MSRP $999.00
Release date October, 2007
Brand LG
love it
want it
have it
tag it
Pros & Cons5
Reviews1
Details
Buy It
Competitors5
Comments9
twitter

Pros & Cons

ProSCORE
1 review
60
negative
mixed
positive
1 positive
0 mixed
0 negative

[i] How is the ProSCORE calculated?

show me!

Pros:
Do you agree?
Compatible with both HD DVD and Blu-ray
+1agreedisagree

Advanced interactivity support for both formats
+1agreedisagree

1080p scaling of standard DVDs
+1agreedisagree

Cons:
Do you agree?
Expensive
+1agreedisagree

No S-Video output
0agreedisagree


2 people added to this review by submitting or voting on pros and cons. Add your say!

Details

Features

  • 1080p/24fps playback of both HD DVD and Blu-ray discs
  • 1080p scaling of standard DVDs
  • HDMI/Component/Composite (no S-Video)
  • LAN connected to make use of web interactivity features
  • Advanced BD-Java and HDi support

The BH200 improves on some problems encountered in the previous generation BH100: 1) full HD DVD playback including menus, 2) 1080p upscaling of standard DVDs (instead of 1080i), and 3) deep color output with HDMI 1.3 support.

Submit a link

This report was started September 24, 2007 at 5:49 pm by Erik
with the last edit occurring August 6, 2008 at 10:40 am by Omar
This page has been viewed 3035 times, with 24 edits by 4 contributors.
See the full report history »

Buy It

Competitors

LG BH200 is ranked 2nd among it's competitors.  See the top picks in Blu-Ray Players »

Suggest a new competitor to add to the list of competing products.
If the product hasn't yet been added to ProductWiki, submitting it here will also start the product report.

Comments

1.  avatar Erik said:

I don't know about these combo players; you can buy two players for less than the price of this combo. Let's just pick a winning format already. I say HD DVD, if for no other reason than the name "Blu-ray" sucks.
Sep 24, 2007 5:58pm
2.  avatar HK-47m4 said:

I disagree. HD DVD's name sucks. If you say it to fast, it sounds like HG DVD. There's to many D's in it. Besides, Blu-Ray is winning so I say Blu-Ray.
Sep 25, 2007 10:06pm
3.  avatar heapatrouble said:

Both formats have their pros and cons, and both have about equal support from studios which seem to be fairly divided between the two (a very recent development). Just from a performance standpoint Blu-ray ought to win hands down due to its greater storage capacity and therefore greater potential for video/sound quality. However, HD-DVD has been generally acknowledged to have more movies which look and sound like HD ought to. That being said, your better single format players are still being priced somewhere between $500 and $1500 (although HD-DVD player prices are consistently lower), so you may actually spend less money overall on a multi-format player if your tastes run to the higher end of things. That being said, there are numerous good reasons to buy a single multi-format player: system simplicity, consistent ergonomics/usability, and using fewer HDMI inputs are all reasons which top my list.
Sep 25, 2007 11:15pm
4.  avatar heapatrouble said:

Also, not having an S-video input is hardly a con in my book. Realistically, if you don't have an HDTV, you have no business buying an HD disc player. You just won't see the benefit and you'd be wasting your money. If you do have an HDTV, then you shouldn't even be considering using an SD connector (composite or S-video) again, you won't see then benefit. Even if you are using a multi-zone and/or multi-source system, the signal degradation that S-video suffers over longer cable runs makes it less likely to be used than a composite video output.
Sep 25, 2007 11:19pm
5.  avatar Omar said:

Combo players need to exist, because that is the future of the HD formats. Similar to how DVD-/+ is no longer an issue the same will eventually happen with the new formats. However it has to start somewhere, and expensive players like this one are that start. In as little as 2-3 years you'll be able to buy a combo player for just a couple hundred dollars more than a single format, and it'll all be a no-brainer.
Sep 26, 2007 11:10am
6.  avatar HK-47m4 said:

Yeah, but in 2-3 years the format war will be finished.
Sep 26, 2007 5:13pm
7.  avatar heapatrouble said:

Conversely, there are professionals who argue that the existence of two formats along with combo players will only prolong and confuse the format war with neither side really winning. These industry pros point to the abysmal failure of SACD and DVD-Audio both and suggest that the entrenchment of various companies in either camp and the existence of combo players only contributed to the demise of both formats as opposed to the eventual success of only one (as with Beta vs. VHS). Personally, I disagree. I believe that both formats could have coexisted successfully but for poor marketing decisions and failure to differentiate themselves in a market which, at the time of their introduction was coming to be dominated by MP3 etc. Obviously, there are no comparable market factors for HD-DVD or Blu-ray (it takes far too long to download HD content and the notion of file-sharing is prohibitive). What would really accelerate the growth of both formats is a reasonable price structure for trhe disc themselves as well as broader support from video renters such as Hollywood or Blockbuster.
Sep 27, 2007 12:23pm
8.  avatar Omar said:

Even with better pricing I think you'll see the formats languish. The pricing isn't too bad right now, so I don't think that's the barrier. It's the confusion. Everybody agrees that there should only be one format. What I'm saying is that you can effectively get the marketing of one format while not having one format. Essentially I'd say going forward the only thing that should be released are combo players. Then change the stupid packaging of Blu-Ray/HD-DVD movies to be the same thing. Companies can use their existing production lines to make what they currently make, but to the consumer it won't MATTER which format the movie is on. It'll be a non-issue.

As for digital distribution, that's my bet on what will be the next big thing. I wrote some stuff last year (link). I'd be REALLY interested to see how sales of movies on Xbox Live Marketplace compares to the high-def releases. In a few years bandwidth will be improving, so streaming HD content won't be unreasonable.
Sep 27, 2007 12:38pm
9.  avatar Erik said:

I remain skeptical about any streaming HD content over the next few years. We're not technology-limited anymore. The technology progresses faster than can be adopted by the consumer, and then you throw in annoying corporations (Blockbuster, Comcast, SBC, Roger's) trying to squeeze out every last buck while they scramble to fight illegal downloads you get stuck with antiquated tech. Video dystopia?
Sep 27, 2007 1:04pm
Some HTML is allowed. Your comments remain editable after you post..

Reviews

Sort by: Most helpful  •  Newest  •  Most positive

Erik

avatar
September 24, 2007
approved
reviewer
ProSCORE
60
negative
mixed
positive
3 pros
2 cons

Pros

  • Compatible with both HD DVD and Blu-ray
  • Advanced interactivity support for both formats
  • 1080p scaling of standard DVDs

Cons

  • Expensive
  • No S-Video output

Comments

"I don't know about these combo players; you can buy two players for less than the price of this combo. Let's just pick a winning format already. I say HD DVD, if for no other reason than the name "Blu-ray" sucks."
"I remain skeptical about any streaming HD content over the next few years. We're not technology-limited anymore. The technology progresses faster than can be adopted by the consumer, and then you throw in annoying corporations (Blockbuster, Comcast, SBC, Roger's) trying to squeeze out every last buck while they scramble to fight illegal downloads you get stuck with antiquated tech. Video dystopia?"

Competitors

Erik prefers LG BH200 over Pioneer BDP-HD1, LG BH100, Panasonic DMP-BD10
Did you find this review helpful?
Yes
 / 
No

Twitter

- join or start the conversation

... Loading for latest tweets from search.twitter.com..

tweetie

sponsored by:
Price comparison information by:

This product is also known as:

BH, 200, BH200