2.8
4 reviews
57

Motorola MOTONAV TN765t


$350.00 Released March, 2010

Product Shot 1 The Pros:Fast location search and route calculation. Wide screen has very good resolution. Great map detail.

The Cons:3D view at minimum zoom only shows about a mile ahead. Small adverts occasionally pop up, that does not appear to be mentioned in the official literature. Autozoom, if enabled, always reverts to only showing a few hundred yards at most. Useless at 65mph on the freeway.

The Motorola MOTONAV TN765t is an advanced GPS receiver that has unique technology that makes navigating while traveling a lot more easier. With a 5.1-inch cinematic LCD display, owners can use the integrated voice recognition technology and QWERTY keyboard as controls.

Where to Buy

loading.. Loading latest prices from ProductWiki...

Along with being Bluetooth capable for hands-free speakerphone, the device allows individuals to stream traffic information that's up-to-date and use the EasySearch and Multiview features to navigate directions in no time at all. What makes the Motorola MOTONAV TN765t different from other models is the fact it also has 3D landmarks that display detailed pictures of specific locations.

Features

  • 5.1-inch cinematic LCD display
  • Stream traffic information
  • 3D landmarks
  • Voice recognition
  • QWERTY keyboard
  • Bluetooth capability
  • EasySearch and Multiview makes navigation easy

User Reviews (4)

  •  
Add Pros & Cons
57
ProScore
Pros
  • 3

    Fast location search and route calculation

  • 2

    Wide screen has very good resolution

  • 1

    Great map detail

  • 1

    Easy and extensive phone integration

  • 1

    2D views have physical map overlay, very useful in some areas

  • 1

    Excellent satellite reception, locks in under a minute from a cold start

  • 1

    Good traffic receiver sensitivity

  • 1

    Thin and light

  • 1

    Good screen brightness

Cons
  • 2

    3D view at minimum zoom only shows about a mile ahead

  • 2

    Small adverts occasionally pop up, that does not appear to be mentioned in the official literature

  • 1

    Autozoom, if enabled, always reverts to only showing a few hundred yards at most. Useless at 65mph on the freeway.

  • 1

    3D landmarks are much more sparse than the advertising suggests

  • 1

    Fastest route calculations are not good, a three year old Garmin has much better algorithms

  • 1

    Traffic information often refers to old or imaginary issues

  • 1

    Traffic avoidance routing is not sensible, it seems to take a short range view and can make things worse

Comments (0)

What's on your mind? See more ProductWiki Talk

You may also like...