55
Samsung PX2370
$370.00
Released April, 2010
The Pros:Full 1080p resolution. Dual digital inputs - HDMI and DVI. 16:9 aspect ratio is ideal for high definition media playback.
The Cons:Cheap non-ergonomically designed stand - no height adjustment or portrait mode, quite wobbly. Expensive for what it is. Ports face outward (not downward), making the thinness of the display useless aesthetically or practically.
The Samsung PX2370 is a 23” LED backlit display screen released in April 2010 as Samsung's latest Syncmaster-branded monitor. It’s only 18mm thick and offers full 1080p high-definition resolution with a 2ms response time and a 5,000,000:1 dynamic contrast ratio.
Loading latest prices from ProductWiki...
Some of the more notable features include a Smart Sensor that automatically switches the monitor off when the user isn’t nearby; a Touch of Color (ToC) design; and compliance with both Energy Star 5.0 and EPEAT Gold standards. Most notable, however, is the fact that the PX2370 doesn’t just support conventional RGB & DVI connections; it also includes an HDMI input for watching content directly from any HD device, such as a gaming console or Blu-ray disc player.
Features
- ENERGY Star 5.0
- EPEAT Gold
- 23” LED Backlit
- ToC Design
- Smart Sensor
- 1080p Resolution
- RGB (D-SUB)
- DVI (Digital)
- HDMI (Full HD)
Specifications
- Type: LED
- Resolution: 1080p
- Contrast: 1000:1
- Dynamic Contrast: 5M:1
- Response Time: 2ms
User Reviews (7)
Pros & Cons
-
2
-
2
dual digital inputs - HDMI and DVI
-
2
16:9 aspect ratio is ideal for high definition media playback
-
2
LED backlight - low power consumption
-
1
attractive aesthetic - slim build, thin bezels, transparent edges and stand
-
1
-
1
great performance - very good colour accuracy and contrast
-
3
cheap non-ergonomically designed stand - no height adjustment or portrait mode, quite wobbly
-
2
-
1
ports face outward (not downward), making the thinness of the display useless aesthetically or practically
-
1
poor reliability - starts switching off and on by itself with no easy or cheap fix
-
-1
standard TN panel - most common, provides inferior colour and viewing angles compared to generally more expensive alternatives
-
-1
16:9 aspect ratio is poor for web browsing and productivity software (too wide) - lacks the vertical resolution of 16:10 monitors, 120 fewer vertical pixels
Community Reviews
see more community reviews
From your Computer
From the Web
Comments (1)
AngelsCurse:
#samsung_px2370 One of the Cons need to be edited :)
1920x1080 16:9 has 120 fewer virtical pixels or 230400 fewer pixels than an 1920x1200 16:10 not 200 fewer virtical pixels which is not that much of a difference, 5:4 is a whole lot more better is you want to read downwords or just tilt your 1920x1080/1200 display on it's side :)
So maybe make 1920x1536 and 2560x2048 displays :)
Sep 1, 10
like
helpful
Read the full review
You may also like...
