scotty442 - ProductWiki

scotty442 commented on Microsoft Windows

scotty442 — Thu, 02 Apr 2009 15:50:56 -0400

April 2, 2009 at 3:50 pm

"no where as good as mac os"

scotty442 updated Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate

scotty442 — Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:08:03 -0500

January 13, 2009 at 12:08 pm

agreed: "sucks big time"
disagreed: "sucks big time"

scotty442 updated 14 products

scotty442 — Wed, 31 Dec 2008 15:48:30 -0500

1. updated Google Chrome - December 31, 2008 at 3:48 pm

disagreed: "Has an "awesome bar" like Firefox "
disagreed: "Useful tick-marks show up in scrollbar when searching a large web page "
disagreed: "Does better than IE, Safari on the Acid3 compliance test (passes both Acid2 and Acid1)"
disagreed: "You can assign keyboard shortcuts to your custom search engines to quickly search using the omnibar "
disagreed: "Autocomplete in the omnibar without using arrow keys "
disagreed: "Drag and drop of tabs into new or existing windows is well done "
disagreed: "Integrated search box into the location bar "
disagreed: "Includes some Safari-esque UI niceities like resizable input boxes "
disagreed: "Open-source"
disagreed: "Seemless transition from Firefox with importing "
disagreed: "Includes "Task Manager" utility to see what web pages/plugins/tabs are using what resources"
disagreed: "Very fast startup time "
disagreed: "Multi-threaded application architecture"
disagreed: "Very clean interface "
disagreed: "Extremely fast web-browsing "
agreed: "No addons yet "
agreed: "Location bar isn't as intelligent as Firefox awesome bar "
agreed: "No "/" for searching in a page "
agreed: "not avaliable on Linux"
agreed: "Can't switch between custom search engines as quickly as Firefox or IE "
agreed: "Security Flaws prevalent"
agreed: "Window placement is wonky with Win-split revolution "
agreed: "High CPU load"
agreed: "Dragging a window into a new window is slow with a low power GPU "
agreed: "No "copy link name" feature "
agreed: "Not available on Mac"
agreed: "Installation is a little weird "
agreed: "Fonts aren't as nice as Safari "

2. updated Opera - December 31, 2008 at 3:47 pm

agreed: "Not supported by all sites"
new pro/con: slow performance

3. updated Windows Internet Explorer - December 31, 2008 at 3:47 pm

disagreed: "Tabbed browsing like Firefox"
disagreed: "Nice tab gallery browsing"
disagreed: "IE 8 has improved performance"
disagreed: "IE 7 runs very fast"

4. updated Mozilla Firefox - December 31, 2008 at 3:46 pm

agreed: "Improved memory usage in v3"
agreed: ""Awesome bar" learns and adapts according to the frequency and recency of pages you visit"
agreed: "Faster browsing in v3"
agreed: "In page searching and highlighting is powerful and straightforward. Just slash and type, or F3 refind: easy!"
agreed: "Page loading can be significantly faster than IE, especially when using speed-enhancing plugins."
agreed: "Fewer security exploits directed at Firefox vs. IE"
agreed: "Open-source project"
agreed: "After a crash can "Restore session" which reopens all tabs"
agreed: "Tabbed browsing"
agreed: "Extensive functional add-ons (extensions) and plug-ins"
disagreed: "Websites designed with proprietary IE/Active X code may not render correctly"
disagreed: "Firefox V2 crashes semi-regularly and uses a lot of computing resources"
disagreed: "v3 Default theme sports obnoxiously large and glossy back button "
disagreed: "Memory usage and load time are significantly slower than IE."
agreed: "Memory usage and load time are significantly slower than IE."
agreed: "v3 Default theme sports obnoxiously large and glossy back button "
agreed: "Firefox V2 crashes semi-regularly and uses a lot of computing resources"

5. updated Microsoft Windows XP Home - December 31, 2008 at 3:44 pm

chose Mac OS X Leopard over Microsoft Windows XP Home

6. updated Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium - December 31, 2008 at 3:44 pm

chose Mac OS X Leopard over Microsoft Windows Vista Home Premium
new pro/con: USER FRIENDLY MY ARSE!
disagreed: "GUI looks pretty fancy"
disagreed: "User friendly"
agreed: "Lacks some of the best features of the system in this version"
agreed: "Takes up a lot of background resources for gamers making games almost unplayable at high graphics"

7. updated Microsoft Windows Vista Home Basic - December 31, 2008 at 3:44 pm

chose Mac OS X Leopard over Microsoft Windows Vista Home Basic

8. updated Mac OS X Tiger - December 31, 2008 at 3:44 pm

chose Mac OS X Leopard over Mac OS X Tiger

9. updated Microsoft Windows XP - December 31, 2008 at 3:44 pm

chose Mac OS X Leopard over Microsoft Windows XP
new pro/con: ARE YOU HIGH? have you heard of ilife b4?

10. updated Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 "Etch" - December 31, 2008 at 3:44 pm

chose Mac OS X Leopard over Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 "Etch"

11. updated Ubuntu 7.10 "Gutsy Gibbon" - December 31, 2008 at 3:44 pm

chose Mac OS X Leopard over Ubuntu 7.10 "Gutsy Gibbon"

12. updated Microsoft Windows Vista Business - December 31, 2008 at 3:44 pm

chose Mac OS X Leopard over Microsoft Windows Vista Business

13. updated Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate - December 31, 2008 at 3:44 pm

chose Mac OS X Leopard over Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate
new pro/con: sucks cock

14. updated Ubuntu 8.04 "Hardy Heron" - December 31, 2008 at 3:44 pm

chose Mac OS X Leopard over Ubuntu 8.04 "Hardy Heron"
chose Mac OS X Leopard over Ubuntu 8.04 "Hardy Heron"

scotty442 updated 2 products

scotty442 — Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:46:08 -0500

1. updated Microsoft Windows Vista Ultimate - December 29, 2008 at 3:46 pm

new pro/con: stable? are you high?

2. updated Microsoft Windows Vista - December 29, 2008 at 3:45 pm

new pro/con: SUCKS DONKEY COCK

scotty442 updated 3 products

scotty442 — Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:36:41 -0500

1. updated Microsoft Windows - December 28, 2008 at 6:36 pm

agreed: "no where as good as mac os"

2. updated Sony VAIO JS Series - December 28, 2008 at 6:35 pm

agreed: "doesn't feature the same quality Apple design"
agreed: "no video out for a second monitor"
agreed: "can't display full 1080p (the main reason for buying the enhanced Blu-ray model)"
agreed: "features older processors and poor video acceleration compared to their Apple equivalents (which are only $100 more)"
agreed: "Not modular: screen and computer components are integrated into one box, making it impossible to upgrade either independently "
agreed: "still comes with Windows"
disagreed: "saves space and looks neater than a regular PC"
disagreed: "good PC alternative to a Mac at a similar price"
disagreed: "an up-to-date platform for fast RAM, most advanced Intel video and wireless N capabilities "
disagreed: "not skimpy on RAM or drivespace"
disagreed: "Irritates Mac people"

3. updated Apple iMac - December 28, 2008 at 6:34 pm

agreed: "24" model actually has better viewing angle then previous generations (178)."
agreed: "24" Model has excellent screen quality."
agreed: "Pretty decent price points for its 4 models"
agreed: "Decent performance from Intel Core 2 Duo CPU"
agreed: "Very clean aesthetic with very few cables and components"
agreed: "Thinner profile than previous generation iMac"
agreed: "Sleek glass and aluminum aesthetic"
disagreed: "Glossy screen too much reflective"
disagreed: "Not the best display quality on the market"
disagreed: "Poorer viewing angle than previous generation"

scotty442 updated 2 products

scotty442 — Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:18:31 -0500

1. updated Asus Eee Box - December 28, 2008 at 3:18 pm

new pro/con: sucks balls
new pro/con: sucks cock

2. updated Sony VAIO JS Series - December 28, 2008 at 3:18 pm

new pro/con: SUCKS BALLS
new pro/con: SUCKS COCK