84
Viliv X10
Released September, 2010
The Pros:10" capacitive touchscreen display with 720p capable 1366 x 768px resolution. Claimed 10-hour battery life. Will be available with Android 2.2 or Windows 7 (2 versions of the device, separate ARM and x86 based devices).
The Cons:Relatively small and unknown company - poor distribution in most of the world. 16:9 display aspect ratio is poorer than less wide display ratios (16:10 or 4:3) for the majority of computing tasks such as browsing the web.
The Viliv X10 is a 10 inch tablet with a 1366x768 capacitive touch screen. It is powered by a ARM processor that is capable of high definition 720p video play back. The X10 runs the Android OS (version 2.2) with a Windows 7 option available as well, although hardware specification might vary for the Windows 7 version.
Loading latest prices from ProductWiki...
It is a feature packed tablet with an SD card reader, USB port, HDMI out, webcam, and wifi connectivity. 3G and WiMAX models will also be available. With a reported battery life of up to 10hrs and up to 32GB of internal flash memory, Viliv appears to have created a strong iPad contended in the X10 tablet.
Features / Specifications
- Android 2.2 Operating system (possible Windows 7 version)
- 10'' Capacitive Touch screen (1366x768)
- 1GHz Samsung C110 Processor (based on ARM Cortex A8)
- 16 / 32GB Internal flash memory
- SD card reader, USB port, HDMI out
- Back facing webcam
- WiFi, 3G, WiMAX (options)
- Up to 10hrs battery life
User Reviews (2)
Pros & Cons
-
2
10" capacitive touchscreen display with 720p capable 1366 x 768px resolution
-
2
claimed 10-hour battery life
-
2
will be available with Android 2.2 or Windows 7 (2 versions of the device, separate ARM and x86 based devices)
-
2
-
2
-
2
16:9 display aspect ratio is superior for watching most HD content
-
2
WiFi connectivity with 3G and WiMAX WWAN options planned
-
2
great build quality - on average for Viliv products
-
2
relatively small and unknown company - poor distribution in most of the world
-
0
16:9 display aspect ratio is poorer than less wide display ratios (16:10 or 4:3) for the majority of computing tasks such as browsing the web
Community Reviews
see more community reviews
From your Computer
From the Web
Comments (0)
helpful
Read the full review
You may also like...
